Contents

    Guides

    Parallel Test Execution in TestNG with Selenium

    Published on

    September 24, 2025
    Parallel Test Execution in TestNG with Selenium

    Automated testing is a critical component of software delivery. As applications expand and require validation across multiple browsers, devices, and operating systems, sequential execution quickly becomes inefficient. 

    Parallel execution in TestNG allows multiple tests to run simultaneously, drastically reducing execution time and enabling faster feedback loops. Combining TestNG’s parallelism model with Selenium WebDriver delivers scalable and reliable automation pipelines.

    How TestNG Parallelism Works (Suites, Tests, Classes, Methods, Instances)?

    TestNG introduces fine-grained control over how tests run in parallel. The parallelism can be defined at different scopes:

    • Suites: Entire test suites specified in the testng.xml file can run simultaneously. This is useful for executing distinct modules of an application at once.
    • Tests: Multiple <test> tags inside testng.xml can run concurrently. Each <test> may contain different sets of classes or groups.
    • Classes: Test classes within a test can run in parallel, allowing independent classes to be executed simultaneously.
    • Methods: Individual test methods across classes can run in parallel, providing the highest degree of concurrency.
    • Instances: When test classes are instantiated multiple times, each instance can run in parallel, particularly beneficial for data-driven scenarios.

    TestNG Configuration Essentials (testng.xml, parallel, thread-count, preserve-order)

    Configuration is the foundation of parallel execution. The testng.xml file defines execution behavior:

    • parallel: Specifies the scope of parallel execution (suites, tests, classes, methods).
    • thread-count: Defines the number of concurrent threads. A higher count means more simultaneous execution but also higher resource usage.
    • preserve-order: When set to true, ensures that methods within a class or test are executed in the order they appear, even in parallel runs.

    Example configuration:

    <suite name="ParallelSuite" parallel="methods" thread-count="4" preserve-order="false">

      <test name="SampleTest">

        <classes>

          <class name="tests.LoginTests"/>

          <class name="tests.CartTests"/>

        </classes>

      </test>

    </suite>

    This setup runs test methods across LoginTests and CartTests simultaneously with up to four threads.

    Threading Knobs in Code (@DataProvider(parallel=true), invocationCount, threadPoolSize, timeouts)

    Beyond testng.xml, TestNG offers annotations to control threading at the code level:

    • @DataProvider(parallel=true): Enables parallel data-driven tests, where each data set runs independently.
    • invocationCount: Repeats a test multiple times, often used for load or stress testing.
    • threadPoolSize: Defines the pool of threads to handle invocations.
    • Timeouts: Setting a timeout ensures that long-running methods don’t block threads indefinitely.

    Example:

    @Test(dataProvider = "getData", invocationCount = 3, threadPoolSize = 3)

    public void testUserLogin(String username, String password) {

        // test logic

    }

    This runs the testUserLogin three times in parallel with three separate threads.

    Project Setup and Structure for Parallel Runs (Packages, Groups, Factories)

    Organizing the project correctly is crucial for smooth parallel execution:

    • Packages: Place related test classes in logical packages for better modularization.
    • Groups: Use @Test(groups="...") to logically group tests for selective parallel runs.
    • Factories: TestNG factories (@Factory) can dynamically generate test instances, useful for parallel parameterization. A clean structure prevents shared-state issues and helps maintain clarity when scaling test suites.

    WebDriver Lifecycle per Thread (ThreadLocal Drivers, Driver Factories, Dependency Injection)

    Selenium WebDriver is not thread-safe, so sharing a single driver instance across threads leads to unpredictable results. The solution is to provide an isolated WebDriver instance per thread:

    • ThreadLocal: Store WebDriver instances in a ThreadLocal variable, ensuring each thread accesses its own driver.
    • Driver Factory Pattern: Centralize driver creation and teardown in a factory, making test classes cleaner.
    • Dependency Injection (DI): Frameworks like Guice or Spring can inject thread-safe driver instances automatically.

    Example using ThreadLocal:

    public class DriverManager {

        private static ThreadLocal<WebDriver> driver = new ThreadLocal<>();

        public static WebDriver getDriver() {

            return driver.get();

        }

        public static void setDriver(WebDriver webDriver) {

            driver.set(webDriver);

        }

    }

    This ensures isolation of WebDriver instances across parallel tests.

    Managing State and Test Data Isolation in Parallel (Fixtures, IDs, Randomness, Cleanup)

    Parallel execution magnifies the risk of test flakiness if state is not isolated. To manage this:

    • Fixtures: Use setup (@BeforeMethod) and teardown (@AfterMethod) hooks for environment preparation and cleanup.
    • Unique IDs: Append randomized identifiers to test data (e.g., usernames, emails).
    • Database/Backend State: Reset or mock services before tests to prevent conflicts.
    • Cleanup: Always remove or roll back test data after execution.
      Proper data isolation ensures tests remain independent and repeatable.

    Synchronization and Stability in Parallel (Explicit Waits, Timeouts, Idempotent Actions)

    Race conditions are common when tests execute in parallel. Stability can be ensured by:

    • Explicit Waits: Use WebDriver’s WebDriverWait with conditions to avoid timing issues.
    • Timeouts: Set sensible maximum wait times to prevent indefinite hangs.
    • Idempotent Actions: Design tests so actions can be safely retried without side effects.
      This minimizes flaky failures caused by synchronization problems.

    Cross-Browser/Platform Matrix Design and Capability Management

    Parallel execution is most impactful when applied across multiple browsers and platforms. Key strategies include:

    • Browser Matrix: Define which browser–OS combinations need coverage.
    • Capability Management: Pass capabilities such as browser version, OS, screen resolution via DesiredCapabilities or Options.
    • Parameterized Tests: Use @Parameters in TestNG to dynamically pick browser configurations.

    Example:

    <parameter name="browser" value="chrome"/>

    <parameter name="version" value="latest"/>

    <parameter name="platform" value="Windows 11"/>

    This ensures diversity in coverage without manual duplication of test logic.

    Running at Scale on Selenium Grid (Topology, Nodes, Capabilities, Session Limits)

    For large projects, Selenium Grid is essential to distribute tests across multiple machines:

    • Topology: Consists of a hub and multiple nodes; the hub routes requests to available nodes.
    • Nodes: Each node hosts specific browser/OS combinations.
    • Capabilities: The hub matches requested capabilities with available nodes.
    • Session Limits: Define maximum concurrent sessions per node to prevent overloading. Running parallel tests on a grid scales coverage and reduces overall execution time.

    FAQs

    Q1. Can all tests be run in parallel?

    Not necessarily. Tests with shared state, dependencies, or fragile setup may fail in parallel runs.

    Q2. What’s the ideal thread count?

    It depends on system resources and grid capacity. A common rule is not to exceed the number of available CPU cores.

    Q3. How do I handle flaky tests?

    Stabilize tests using explicit waits, retries, and proper data isolation.

    Q4. Does parallel execution increase hardware costs?

    Yes, but the time saved in faster feedback loops often justifies the investment. Cloud solutions can mitigate infrastructure costs.

    Why Run TestNG with Selenium Tests in Parallel on Real Devices?

    Simulating concurrency on virtualized environments is useful but often insufficient. Real devices and browsers expose issues such as rendering glitches, network instability, and performance bottlenecks that emulators miss. 

    Running parallel tests on a real device cloud like BrowserStack Automate ensures that every test scenario is validated against actual hardware and browser versions. This enables teams to detect cross-browser bugs early, reduce release cycles, and deliver a consistent user experience to end users.

    Conclusion

    Parallel test execution in TestNG with Selenium is a powerful technique to accelerate test cycles while expanding coverage. By configuring parallelism effectively, isolating WebDriver instances, managing test data, and leveraging Selenium Grid or real device clouds, teams can achieve scalable and reliable automation. The combination of TestNG’s flexibility and Selenium’s capabilities makes it possible to validate modern web applications under real-world conditions with speed and confidence.

    Run Selenium Tests on Cloud

    Data-rich bug reports loved by everyone

    Get visual proof, steps to reproduce and technical logs with one click

    Make bug reporting 50% faster and 100% less painful

    Rating LogosStars
    4.6
    |
    Category leader

    Liked the article? Spread the word

    Put your knowledge to practice

    Try Bird on your next bug - you’ll love it

    “Game changer”

    Julie, Head of QA

    star-ratingstar-ratingstar-ratingstar-ratingstar-rating

    Overall rating: 4.7/5

    Try Bird later, from your desktop